Here’s an old entry cross posted from another blog
With everything that’s gone on in the past year and a half you would think that the case against deregulation would be pretty clear to even the most partisan person. After all, call me a “crazy liberal” but it seems like common sense that the government should demand that banks operating as insurance companies have enough money to pay off the “insurance” they’re selling . After all, we demand insurance companies do it. But the more I talk to even the casual conservative the more I hear this myth that the government encouraging lending to low income people who couldn’t pay their mortgages was the cause of our current mess.
So here I find myself, almost a year after the crisis hit its apex, trying to debunk this patently false myth. Of course, we could just do a few seconds of napkin math and figure this out for ourselves. The cost of all the mortgages in the United States + even the most insane interest rates < the estimated 11.96 trillion dollars lost because of this scandal. But of course, that’s far to simple and straightforward to satisfy people who don’t even believe in evolution. So let’s break it down like C.R. Avery on the piano box
The Myth: The Financial Crisis was caused by banks forced into making bad loans to low income people by the Government
Conservatives love to talk about personal responsibility. That is of course, when it comes time for them to take responsibility for the mistakes they’ve made. The financial crisis at the heart of the economic recession we are in, and primary cause of our sky high unemployment rate, is no different. When you ask Republicans what cause the financial crisis, they don’t hesitate to place the blame on the two groups they love to hate the most. Low income people and the government. Indeed, they answer so quickly that you’d swear that their response resulted more as a natural reflex rather than a careful and dispassionate examination of the facts. Had they done so, they probably would have realize how patently false this claim is.
The Truth: NO. Government encouraged lending to low income people DID NOT cause the Financial crisis.
The evidence against this myth is pretty cut and dry. Laid out clearly by Robert Gordon in the American Prospect. To help you digest his arguments more efficiently I’ll break them down point by point
1. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 was…well enacted in 1977, 30 years before the crisis:
The evidence strongly suggests the latter. First, consider timing. CRA was enacted in 1977. The sub-prime lending at the heart of the current crisis exploded a full quarter century later. In the mid-1990s, new CRA regulations and a wave of mergers led to a flurry of CRA activity, but, as noted by the New America Foundation’s Ellen Seidman (and by Harvard’s Joint Center), that activity “largely came to an end by 2001.” In late 2004, the Bush administration announced plans to sharply weaken CRA regulations, pulling small and mid-sized banks out from under the law’s toughest standards. Yet sub-prime lending continued, and even intensified — at the very time when activity under CRA had slowed and the law had weakened.
2. Non- CRA were responsible for the majority of faulty sub prime loans:
Second, it is hard to blame CRA for the mortgage meltdown when CRA doesn’t even apply to most of the loans that are behind it. As the University of Michigan’s Michael Barr points out, half of sub-prime loans came from those mortgage companies beyond the reach of CRA. A further 25 to 30 percent came from bank subsidiaries and affiliates, which come under CRA to varying degrees but not as fully as banks themselves. (With affiliates, banks can choose whether to count the loans.) Perhaps one in four sub-prime loans were made by the institutions fully governed by CRA.
3. CRA Banks were less likely to engage in dangerous lending:
Most important, the lenders subject to CRA have engaged in less, not more, of the most dangerous lending. Janet Yellen, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve, offers the killer statistic: Independent mortgage companies, which are not covered by CRA, made high-priced loans at more than twice the rate of the banks and thrifts. With this in mind, Yellen specifically rejects the “tendency to conflate the current problems in the sub-prime market with CRA-motivated lending? CRA, Yellen says, “has increased the volume of responsible lending to low- and moderate-income households.”
Gordon has more information in his article, like warning from various Governors of the Fed, about the unsustainability of the housing bubble, but you’ll have to read the full article for that.
UPDATE: Here’s a lot more compelling evidence debunking this zombie myth
Paul Krugman graphs are more than a thousand words
Blame the poor minorities? How about the wealthy multiple house owners? Yves Smith OF Naked Capitalism reports that wealthy people are the most likely to default on their mortgages
Even governors of the Fed aren’t buying this CRA talking point
The FDIC chairwoman quite clearly says “CRA: NOT GUILTY”
Barry Ritholtz uses reverse logic to debunk the anti-CRA claim
Dainel Gross of Slate a must read article about the
bullshit factual inaccuracies with this myth