Repeat After Me: Eliminating Earmarks DOES NOT Save Money!

Stan Collender makes the point I’ve been trying to make. Eliminating earmarks, which account for less than 1% of the budget, would save absolutely no money at all:

Lost in all of the debate (and the reporting about the debate) on the earmarks in the omnibus 2009 appropriations bill the Senate is still working to adopt is the basic fact that cutting earmarks doesn’t save any money. This is not open for discussion. An earmark simply is a congressional decision to allocate part of appropriation for a particular purpose. Eliminating the allocation doesn’t reduce the appropriation, it simply leaves the allocation decision to a federal department or agency rather than to Congress. But keep in mind that projects approved by a department or agency are just as likely to be infuriating as projects included at the behest of of a member of Congress.

Couldn’t have said it better myself. Click here for my blog entry about this subject.

Advertisements

One thought on “Repeat After Me: Eliminating Earmarks DOES NOT Save Money!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s