The Saga Continues…

If you haven’t been reading the Chronicles of Lesser Phil you really need to start now.

Long story short, when I moved out of my house in Omaha another guy named Phil, now known as Lesser Phil, moved in and he’s a douchebag.

Moral of the story: Next time listen to my advice on prospective roomates 😉


Clinton Proposes New Debate Format

The Clinton campaign is taking the initiative to create a better forum for discussion of the issues. The proposed debate formate would be similar to the famous Lincoln Douglas debates and fairly similar to collegiate debate format:

Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will participate in a 90-minute debate in an open public forum. Just the two of them — no questioners, no panelists, no video clips. One candidate would speak for two minutes, then the other, alternating back and forth all the way through the debate. Their discussion – not any pre-set rules – would determine how long they spend on one subject before moving on to another. Such a debate would range across all of the challenges, large and small, we face as a nation or it could focus on the most significant issue we face today, — the economy.

Great idea right?Jonathan Singer from Mydd doesn’t think so

However, these “Lincoln-Douglas Style Debates”, as the Clinton campaign calls them, would not diverge so much from the modern trend of sound-bite driven campaigning or hew closely to the true nature of the Lincoln-Douglas debates. No, instead of allowing each candidate to speak in a measured, thoughtful and clear manner, laying out his or her case and responding to the other candidate’s case, the debates proposed by the Clinton campaign would just be more in a series of made-for-television, “Crossfire”-like quasi-debates that show less about the quality of a candidate’s thoughts and beliefs than they do about the candidate’s ability to come up with a biting sound-bite or a funny joke.

There’s two issues involved here:

1. The effectiveness of the proposed debate format
2. The politics behind having more debates.

On the first issues;

Considering the fact that everyone complains about the horrible format of political debates and/or the vacuous guidance from moderators we should applaud the Clinton campaign for at least proposing a new format. It may not be perfect, but where’s the alternative from the Obama campaign who always claims it wants to sit down and talk about the issues?

But politics aside, its about damn time a major presidential candidate proposed a new format for a debate. No offense,but your criticisms against Clinton’s proposed debate format are pretty damn insignificant. The time limits are too short is hardly a deathblow to the proposed debate format. If the two campaigns are truly interested in having a discussion about the issues, a claim both candidates have made repeatedly, then they can agree to specific speaking times.

The anwser to the political aspect of whether to debate or not is simple. If Obama really wants to have a debate about the issues, a claim he’s made numerous times, then this is a perfect non media driven forum for the candidates to actually have a genuine conversation.

Desperate Obama to Increase Negative Attacks

Yes politics of hope and change my ass

Unable once again to score a knockout, Sen. Barack Obama is likely to make his new negative tone even more negative — with a sharp eye on trying to end the Democratic presidential nomination fight after the May 6 primaries in Indiana and North Carolina.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton‘s victory yesterday in Pennsylvania has only accentuated the quandary that Obama faces: Stay negative and he risks undermining the premise of his candidacy. Stay aloof and he underscores Clinton’s argument that he will not be able to beat a “Republican attack machine” sure to greet him this summer.

Obama himself took up the cudgel after Clinton delivered a victory speech in Philadelphia devoid of attack lines. Without naming Clinton, he suggested in Evansville, Ind., that she is a captive to the oil, pharmaceutical and insurance lobbies, that she “says and does whatever it takes to win the next election,” and that she exploits division for political gain

How can Obama change Washington politics by engaging in the sort of tactics he attacks everyday? Of course this is nothing new. Very early in the primary Obama did in fact run a fairly positive campaign. However he all but abandoned that after his surprise defeat in New Hampshire.

But of course, any negative attacks Obama makes will be blamed on Clinton.