What does Obama have against universal healthcare?

Because universal is what is plan ain’t. There’s a number I want you to think of when you hear the name Barack Obama. 15 million. Because that’s the number of people who would not be covered under Barack Obama’s health care plan. In case you didn’t know, unlike the Edwards and Clinton plan, Obama’s plan does not include a mandate that everyone be covered under their proposed health care system. Thus, in Obama’s plan some people are covered and some people are not. Why is this a problem? Paul Krugman explains:

Why have a mandate? The whole point of a universal health insurance system is that everyone pays in, even if they’re currently healthy, and in return everyone has insurance coverage if and when they need it.

And it’s not just a matter of principle. As a practical matter, letting people opt out if they don’t feel like buying insurance would make insurance substantially more expensive for everyone else.

Here’s why: under the Obama plan, as it now stands, healthy people could choose not to buy insurance — then sign up for it if they developed health problems later. Insurance companies couldn’t turn them away, because Mr. Obama’s plan, like those of his rivals, requires that insurers offer the same policy to everyone.

As a result, people who did the right thing and bought insurance when they were healthy would end up subsidizing those who didn’t sign up for insurance until or unless they needed medical care.


One thought on “What does Obama have against universal healthcare?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s