«
»

That’s not true! : Obama and his lobbyists

I thought this was a good homemade ad:

And before anyone tries that whole “oh but he’s a state lobbyist” bs remember that Obama’s National Co-Chairman Jim Hodges is a FEDERAL lobbyist.

(Read the update at the bottom)

This entry was posted on January 10, 2008 at 12:57 pm and is filed under Politics with tags , , , , , , , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “That’s not true! : Obama and his lobbyists”

  1. B Merry Says:
    January 10, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    How about Obama’s NINE registered lobbyist bundlers?

    http://www.taylormarsh.com/hot_topics.php#1126

    Or his K Street endorsers?

    http://www.taylormarsh.com/hot_topics.php#1124

    Do they count?

    Reply
  2. The Douche Says:
    January 12, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    It seems that the political bashing has been a little one sided. How about a post and investigation into this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw&feature=related. I know you love Hillary but I think that you love comics more.

    Reply
  3. Phil Says:
    January 12, 2008 at 3:40 pm

    You should know better than to get your news for Youtube and Ron Paul supporters

    Reply
  4. Phil Says:
    January 12, 2008 at 3:43 pm

    Paul’s claims have not found traction. An audit by the Federal Elections Commission found that neither Senator Clinton nor her Senate campaign had accepted any illegal funds in connection with the Hollywood fundraiser[39], though the campaign was asked to pay $35,000 in fines for having underreported the cost of the party.[40] Paul’s suit against the FEC was thrown out; his attempt to bring ethics charges against Clinton were rejected,[41] and his fraud charges against Senator Clinton were tossed out in April 2006.[42] Paul continued to press civil charges against Senator Clinton and former President Clinton for “looting”[43] his business, but the courts refused to allow him to sue Senator Clinton, with the appellate court specifying that her behavior had been “perfectly legal,” and allowing her to recoup her legal fees from Paul.[39]

    Stop hanging out with Mark

    Reply

Leave a Reply